Inkluso
https://klariq.eu/?badge=1
Accessibility score
- Critical0
- Serious1
- Moderate0
- Minor0
The score is based on 1 page tested (the homepage). A full audit assesses up to 100 pages across templates; the overall result may differ.
Get the full audit
The sitemaps of this site list 43 URLs; the audit covered 1 page across 1 template.
Complete PDF report with all findings, legal references and fix guidance.
The full audit adds:
- Up to 100 pages sampled across the templates of the site.
- One fix card per rule with code snippets, and for contrast the exact replacement colour.
- An accessibility statement prefilled with the operator and the contact address.
- PDF plus a developer export (JSON) with evidence for every instance.
Insufficient colour contrast: the only finding, shown in full.
What it is: Text colour and background are too close; the ratio is below 4.5:1 (or 3:1 for large text). The usual causes are light-grey text, thin type on colour, and placeholders in forms.
Who it affects: People with low vision, older users, and anyone in poor conditions (sun, small screen, fatigue).
Why it matters: Customers cannot read the price, the size, the stock status or the terms, and they abandon the purchase. On a phone in daylight the whole page fades into one surface. 1.4.3 is a Level AA requirement under EN 301 549, and insufficient contrast is by far the most common finding on the web (WebAIM Million).
How to fix: Every instance below states the measured ratio and a concrete replacement text colour (for example "suggestion: text #444b52 instead of #68737d"). Apply it in the element's CSS rule, or better in the design token or variable the colour is inherited from; one token change fixes every instance of the same kind. The target is a ratio of at least 4.5:1 (3:1 for large text from 24 px, or 18.66 px bold). Changing the background colour is equally valid if you confirm it by measuring.
First failing element:
.logo-mark
Computed colour contrast below the required 4.5:1 against the element's actual rendered background (measured from a screenshot; axe-core could not read the bac…
Related provision: EAA Annex I Section III(c) (Directive (EU) 2019/882); EN 301 549 §9.1.4.3
Perceivable requirement: EN 301 549 §9.1.4.3 (WCAG 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)). EN 301 549 is the reference technical standard for this requirement (see _meta on the presumption of conformity).
On the way to a purchase
A selection of the findings below, from pages a buyer passes through. It does not say whether a purchase can or cannot be completed. Only one page was scanned, so this selection comes from that page.
| color-contrast Insufficient colour contrast | Home page | 1× |
Accessibility statement (draft)
This is an automatically generated DRAFT accessibility statement for https://klariq.eu/?badge=1, based on an automated test. It does not constitute confirmation of full legal conformance.
1. Operator and website
Operator: [add the operator's name]
Website: https://klariq.eu/?badge=1
2. Conformance status
An automated test of 1 page found shortfalls against WCAG 2.1 AA / EN 301 549. The conformance status of the whole site is what the full audit establishes.
Applicable legislation: Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act)
3. Non-accessible content
- Insufficient colour contrast, 1× on 1 page (related requirement: EAA Annex I Section III(c) (Directive (EU) 2019/882); EN 301 549 §9.1.4.3).
4. Preparation of this statement
Automated testing with axe-core. Note: automated tools detect roughly 30–40% of WCAG criteria; a full assessment requires a manual audit. Axe-core® is a trademark of Deque Systems, Inc. in the US and other countries.
Scope of the automated test: 1 page.
Date prepared: 2026-09-24
5. Feedback and contact
Report accessibility issues with this website to [your organisation's email address].
6. Enforcement and complaints
Supervisory body: the authority that each Member State designates under Art. 23(2) to check the compliance of services (Art. 23(1)(a)) and to follow up complaints or reports on non-compliance of services (Art. 23(1)(b)); a consumer may take action under national law before the courts or the competent administrative bodies (Art. 29(2)(a)); provider duties for services are in Art. 13, and Art. 14 is the fundamental-alteration and disproportionate-burden limit.
If the operator does not reply to your accessibility feedback, or you are not satisfied with the reply, you can contact that body.